FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Earlier this week, SeaWorld released its financial results for the first quarter of 2015, and on the surface things seem to be heading in a positive direction. CEO Joel Manby revealed that attendance at SeaWorld parks was up 5.6% versus the same period last year, and the loss reported for the quarter was not as bad as initial projections suggested.

However, though the boosted attendance is certainly a good sign, Manby made several statements during an eanings call that seem to indicate that big changes are on the way to SeaWorld parks, with SeaWorld Orlando being the focus of renewed efforts to get attendance back on track. Though Manby stopped short of confirming either of these changes, we feel confident that these rumored developments are at least being considered at a very high level, based on comments from Manby himself. 

1. Could SeaWorld Orlando's Blue World be canned?

Though SeaWorld announced its Blue World initiative last year without confirming a construction commencement date for SeaWorld Orlando, recent comments suggest CEO Joel Manby might not be convinced that this new project (which will increase the size of killer whale tanks) will be enough to get guests back in the parks again.

When asked about the project’s development, Manby was cagey, saying that while the San Diego project is "still on track" to open in 2018, SeaWorld “may adapt [its] approach looking forward [to Orlando and San Antonio].” Manby then said that SeaWorld will “learn from [the San Diego Project], and those learnings will be taken as we look at the other projects moving forward. But what we won't waver on is, we're committed to the health and care of our animals and delivering value to our guests. Also, very importantly, our shareholders."

It seems strange that Manby isn’t willing to give a solid status update for the Blue World project in Orlando, which could possibly hint at that SeaWorld’s new CEO is pushing the project back at the Orlando and San Antonio parks in an effort to see if Blue World produces any guest momentum in San Diego. If it doesn’t, odds are that Blue World will be cancelled altogether in Orlando as construction hasn’t begun yet, and no start date has been discussed.

Not only would putting this project on hold save SeaWorld some much-needed capital in the short term (which was a legitimate concern for investors when Blue World was first announced), but either pausing or cancelling Blue World could help the park instead focus at creating new experiences (instead of just building off old ones) to help recapture guest's attention. Which brings us to our next big possible change... 

FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Comments

I can't help but admit that I'm a little disappointed about the announcement that Blue World might be cancelled. Look I'm a reasonable person, I understand why sea world keeps killer whales and I also know what an amazing job sea world does around the world with conservation and rescue of marine animals. However I've always thought that the tanks were too small for the whales, when I saw the announcement for Blue World I was very happy and was content to visit Sea World once again. However if they cancel it to focus more on rides, I will not be attending the park.

Note to SeaWorld- counting Atlantis you have 3 roller coasters in Orlando now, will adding a 4th increase your attendance? I doubt it. Adding family rides or rides for those 50 and over (who have more money to spend), or more concerts, may add more to your bottom line than catering just to teens and 20 year olds.

I take a Florida once a year and regardless of where I go in FL., I manage to do at least one day at Sea World. I sincerely hope that they do not dissolve Blue Horizons, but if it is to be progress must go on. I will continue to visit every year as long it is possible for me to do so. Thank you for the education that you supply.

Stupid tree huggers. Animals are mainly for entertainment and sometimes food. Who cares how they feel?

Being someone that loved seaworld specifically for it's aquatic animals I would not be impressed nor would I visit for the rides. I am more concerned with the health and safety of the killer whales. After watching blackfish, and as a child thinking the whales needed something bigger than a bathtub to swim in, I am longer a seaworld patron. Zoo is not what I would call seaworld, until those whales have more adequate housing I wouldn't even think about adding rides for park visitors or the need to make the shareholders pockets right. Your first responsibility should be the health and well being of the majestic, intelligent whales.

View More Comments

Add new comment

About Theme Park Tourist

Theme Park Tourist is one of the web’s leading sources of essential information and entertaining articles about theme parks in Orlando and beyond.

We are one of the world’s largest theme park guide sites, hosting detailed guides to more than 80 theme parks around the globe.

Find Out More About Us...

Plan Your Trip

Our theme park guides contain reviews and ratings of rides, restaurants and hotels at more than 80 theme parks worldwide.

You can even print them.

Start Planning Now...