FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Believe it or not, even Disney gets it wrong once in a while. Sometimes, they get it really, really wrong. 

Here on Theme Park Tourist, we’ve been building a library of Lost Legends – in-depth features that chronicle the epic stories behind the world’s best and most adored lost attractions. We’ve voyaged 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, escaped a vengeful goddess aboard TOMB RAIDER: The Ride, ignited a spark on Journey into Imagination, huffed and puffed through German forests aboard Big Bad Wolf, raced through Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride, and many more, all with the sincere hope that your comments, stories, and memories will preserve those long-lost but still-loved rides for a new generation.

But the hits are only half the story. Our new series, Disaster Files, dives deep into a very different world: theme park flops, failures, and missteps that simply can’t be forgotten. It started with our in-depth look at the Enchanted Tiki Room: Under New Management, a distinctly '90s overlay of a Walt Disney classic that was so disjointed, many fans were relieved when it literally caught on fire. We saw Epcot's most hated ride ever come to life in the full story behind Journey into YOUR Imagination. Then there was the in-depth story behind Disney California Adventure's Superstar Limo, understood as the worst dark ride Disney ever created.

Image: Disney

But today, we’ll strap into one of – if not the most – disastrous, ill-fated, and unanimously disliked attractions Disney has ever designed. Avoided by guests, skipped by fans, and mercilessly mocked by all, this can only be the story of the Magic Kingdom menace that is Stitch’s Great Escape.

Arguably the worst attraction at any Disney Park on Earth, most fans will tell you that Stitch’s Great Escape is truly the embodiment of a disaster. And most unbelievably, after more than a decade of backlash and declining interest, Disney is finally beginning to mothball this most disliked attraction. But how did we get here? What’s the evolution behind the most despised Disney attraction on Earth? The story may be more complex than you know. Hold on tight.

Blast from the past

Stitch’s Great Escape opened November 16, 2004. But our story begins two decades before. Twenty years earlier, Disney’s destiny appeared sunk. If you can imagine, the Walt Disney Company in the early 1980s was floundering. A series of live action box office bombs and forgettable, regrettable animated films had stretched the company to its breaking point and – just as importantly – soured its once-golden reputation. Disney was far from an industry leader.

In 1984, a knight in shining armor arrived to revive Disney’s soggy status, rejuvenate its film and animation, and breathe new life into its slow-growing theme parks. We’re talking about Michael Eisner.

Image: Disney

Sure, a few decades later (and even unto today), Eisner’s name would be tied to a creative and financial drought, leading to half-baked theme parks, under built rides, an irreverent infusion of cartoon characters, and company-wide cost-cutting. But in 1984, Eisner was exactly who Disney needed. Fresh from a stint as CEO of Paramount Pictures, Eisner’s finger was on the pulse of pop culture, entertainment, and film, and he at once set out to revive Disney from its foundation. Eisner’s influence is what triggered what we now know as the Disney Renaissance (when Disney produced hit after hit after hit from The Little Mermaid to AladdinBeauty and the Beast to the The Lion King and beyond).

While he might’ve been a natural in the movie industry, he knew decidedly less about theme parks. Allegedly, when he received the role as CEO, Michael invited his son, Breck, to tour Disneyland with him. Breck’s response – that Disneyland was for babies – shook Eisner to his core. He threw himself into the Imagineering facilities in Glendale, California and – surprisingly frankly – asked Imagineers to show and explain what they were working on. It was on that day, apparently, that Eisner began to green light projects left and right, trusting that Imagineers knew their parks and could craft exceptional attractions given the freedom to dream big. Eisner was certain that his team could build Disneyland into a place even teenagers would want to visit. To make it happen, he’d use his strength once again: movies.

Ride the movies

It was Eisner’s controversial idea that Disney Parks could be a place where guests would “ride the movies.” While that was a brave enough idea, he also argued that they didn’t necessarily have to be Disney movies! After all, remember that Disney wasn’t making many movies worth celebrating in the early 1980s. But someone was.

Image: Disney / Lucasfilm

Eisner reached out to George Lucas, the creator of Star Wars, about bringing the world of the film series (owned and distributed by 20th Century Fox) into Disney Parks. The partnership was a success, resulting in Captain EO (1986) and, less than a year later, the real test of Eisner's cinematic formula: a ride that changed Disney Parks forever. We chronicled the full and complete story of that stellar collaboration in a standalone feature – Lost Legend: Star Tours.

Star Tours' success paved the way for more, and Eisner’s movie-making mantra came to life again shortly thereafter when plans for a filmmaking-themed pavilion at EPCOT Center took on a life of their own and became a full-fledged, standalone movie-making park: Disney-MGM Studios. Shortly after opening, the park became home to its own Star Tours and, nearby, the Indiana Jones Epic Stunt Spectacular based on Lucas’ other runaway smash property.

“The Tomorrowland Problem”

As the 1990s approached, Imagineers faced a unique and growing challenge: one we’ve often referred to here as the Tomorrowland Problem. Both Disneyland and Magic Kingdom contain Tomorrowlands – themed areas that, according to Walt’s dedication speech, are meant to “signify man’s achievements… A step into the future, with predictions of constructed things to come.”

Sounds easy. However, the “tomorrow” that Imagineers had designed in 1955 was set in the unimaginably distant year of… 1986. It didn’t last enough to become outdated, though. In 1967 – just 12 years after the park opened – Tomorrowland leapt forward. The New Tomorrowland Walt and his Imagineers designed was iconic – a white, geometric, simple land of pastel colors with the glorious Peoplemover zipping overhead, submarines churning through crystal lakes, the rotating Carousel Theater, and an expansion pad cordoned off to become the gleaming Space Mountain.

Image: Disney

The “old” Tomorrowland had contained a starring attraction called Flight to the Moon. The predecessor to a modern motion simulator, Flight to the Moon was really just a series of seats arranged in concentric circles around a central platform (above). Seated guests would watch through projected “portholes” and “glass windows” at the center, simulating a trip through space and a moon landing. Evidence of “the Tomorrowland Problem,” Flight to the Moon wasn’t feeling very futuristic by the 1960s, as regular trips to the moon made the ride seem like the stuff of today’s headlines, not tomorrow’s. Fittingly, the simple attraction received a simple upgrade and re-debuted in this New Tomorrowland as the much more futuristic Mission to Mars.

When Magic Kingdom opened in 1971 with its own Tomorrowland, it had the benefit of learning from Disneyland’s mistakes and its Tomorrowland was already future-ready with its own Peoplemover, Circlevision, Carousel Theater, and a purpose-built Mission to Mars.

Trouble is, tomorrow always becomes today, and by the 1990s, both Tomorrowlands were feeling downright dated. Luckily, Imagineers had a new blank canvas on which to put a new idea to the test.

Image: Disney

Imagineers designing Disneyland Paris set out to fix the Tomorrowland Problem permanently by leaving Tomorrowland out of the French park entirely. In its place stands Discoveryland, a retro­-­futuristic land. Discoveryland doesn’t even try to imagine what the future might really look like. Instead, it’s a vision of the future as imagined from great thinkers of the past! Rather than sleek white landscapes showcasing evolving technologies, Discoveryland is a golden seaport that looks right out of the pages of Jules Verne, Leonardo da Vinci, or H.G. Wells.

Spurred by the innovation, Eisner okayed a major change at Disney Parks in the U.S. He wanted Imagineers to craft New New Tomorrowlands. But unlike the New Tomorrowlands of old, these overlays would fix the Tomorrowland Problem permanently by taking the science out of the land. Instead of really trying to predict what the future might look like (an impossible, expensive, and maintenance-heavy task), these New Tomorrowland’s would follow Paris’ example.

This is where things get interesting…. Not to mention, terrifying.

FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Comments

As someone who has done both attractions, i think stitch is 100 times better than Alien ever was.

Furthermore, your ascertation that this attraction appeals to no age group is an assumption at best n based on opinion. I see no survey data nor snippets stating unbiased individual opinions of said attraction.
As someone whom has written for established news papers before, a good journalist knows how to write an article without interjecting opinion(which is highly evident throughout the article).
Maybe in thr future actusl numerical compilation can be done to show ridership of an attraction to support basis of claim. Or maybe solicit others opinions n post them to support the basis of an article.

Just my opinion as someone whom has been published in the past.

In reply to by Jr Houston (not verified)

I don't know that I ever broadcast any entries in this series as entirely, objectively journalistic. In fact, I continuously denote that they're in-depth stories behind beloved-and-lost attractions or disastrous misses! From the start, a series called "Lost Legends" or "Designing Disasters" should hint that the contents are hardly objective! In fact, they're subjective deep-dives that intentionally ask for people to share their memories, experiences, and stories. The point is to look critically and creatively at these attractions and preserve the experiences for future generations through storytelling (mine and yours in the comments), not to save their data or their scientific survey results.

I don't *have* survey data to tell me that the attraction is too juvenile for pre-teens and too scary for anyone younger; frankly, I don't need it! My "ascertation" is shared by many. The attraction's odd tone is a result of its odd history as chronicled here, and that's part of its intriguing origin story that I hope I captured! An overwhelming majority Disney Parks fans agree that Stitch's Great Escape is simply not a good attraction, as evidenced by stories, comments, data, ratings, and anecdotal evidence preserved here and across the internet and parks. While some people appreciate it (and I have absolute respect for those people), it's largely agreed upon that it's a mess.

I maintain that this article – and each entry in the rest of my extensive collection here! – is a thoughtful, well-researched, well-written piece that generates critical thinking, conversation, appreciation for detail, and an idea of the "big picture" that shaped these attractions. The purpose of these Designing Disaster and Lost Legends articles is to spark discussion and bring varying opinions to the table, and I sincerely enjoy that! But as a "good journalist" who's written for established newspapers before, I'm sure you realize the value of storytelling. I don't believe I need "thr future actusl numerical compilation ... to support basis of claim." Instead, I tell the story as I know it and let everyone here fill in the blanks and tell their stories. Thanks for the thoughts though! Hoping I'll be published one day, too. ;P

I'm 0/2 on these stories, this is my favorite Tomorrowland ride...and I loved Under New Management. I guess my Disney taste is just bad...

Takes all kinds...! Maybe we'll end up with an entry that you can agree with. Can you think of any "disastrous" attractions past or present? I've got a few more I'm thinking of...

In reply to by Jodi (not verified)

I liked Under New Management better too!

View More Comments

Add new comment

About Theme Park Tourist

Theme Park Tourist is one of the web’s leading sources of essential information and entertaining articles about theme parks in Orlando and beyond.

We are one of the world’s largest theme park guide sites, hosting detailed guides to more than 80 theme parks around the globe.

Find Out More About Us...

Plan Your Trip

Our theme park guides contain reviews and ratings of rides, restaurants and hotels at more than 80 theme parks worldwide.

You can even print them.

Start Planning Now...