FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Believe it or not, even Disney gets it wrong once in a while. Sometimes, they get it really, really wrong. 

Here on Theme Park Tourist, we’ve been building a library of Lost Legends – in-depth features that chronicle the epic stories behind the world’s best and most adored lost attractions. We’ve voyaged 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, escaped a vengeful goddess aboard TOMB RAIDER: The Ride, ignited a spark on Journey into Imagination, huffed and puffed through German forests aboard Big Bad Wolf, raced through Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride, and many more, all with the sincere hope that your comments, stories, and memories will preserve those long-lost but still-loved rides for a new generation.

But the hits are only half the story. Our new series, Disaster Files, dives deep into a very different world: theme park flops, failures, and missteps that simply can’t be forgotten. It started with our in-depth look at the Enchanted Tiki Room: Under New Management, a distinctly '90s overlay of a Walt Disney classic that was so disjointed, many fans were relieved when it literally caught on fire. We saw Epcot's most hated ride ever come to life in the full story behind Journey into YOUR Imagination. Then there was the in-depth story behind Disney California Adventure's Superstar Limo, understood as the worst dark ride Disney ever created.

Image: Disney

But today, we’ll strap into one of – if not the most – disastrous, ill-fated, and unanimously disliked attractions Disney has ever designed. Avoided by guests, skipped by fans, and mercilessly mocked by all, this can only be the story of the Magic Kingdom menace that is Stitch’s Great Escape.

Arguably the worst attraction at any Disney Park on Earth, most fans will tell you that Stitch’s Great Escape is truly the embodiment of a disaster. And most unbelievably, after more than a decade of backlash and declining interest, Disney is finally beginning to mothball this most disliked attraction. But how did we get here? What’s the evolution behind the most despised Disney attraction on Earth? The story may be more complex than you know. Hold on tight.

Blast from the past

Stitch’s Great Escape opened November 16, 2004. But our story begins two decades before. Twenty years earlier, Disney’s destiny appeared sunk. If you can imagine, the Walt Disney Company in the early 1980s was floundering. A series of live action box office bombs and forgettable, regrettable animated films had stretched the company to its breaking point and – just as importantly – soured its once-golden reputation. Disney was far from an industry leader.

In 1984, a knight in shining armor arrived to revive Disney’s soggy status, rejuvenate its film and animation, and breathe new life into its slow-growing theme parks. We’re talking about Michael Eisner.

Image: Disney

Sure, a few decades later (and even unto today), Eisner’s name would be tied to a creative and financial drought, leading to half-baked theme parks, under built rides, an irreverent infusion of cartoon characters, and company-wide cost-cutting. But in 1984, Eisner was exactly who Disney needed. Fresh from a stint as CEO of Paramount Pictures, Eisner’s finger was on the pulse of pop culture, entertainment, and film, and he at once set out to revive Disney from its foundation. Eisner’s influence is what triggered what we now know as the Disney Renaissance (when Disney produced hit after hit after hit from The Little Mermaid to AladdinBeauty and the Beast to the The Lion King and beyond).

While he might’ve been a natural in the movie industry, he knew decidedly less about theme parks. Allegedly, when he received the role as CEO, Michael invited his son, Breck, to tour Disneyland with him. Breck’s response – that Disneyland was for babies – shook Eisner to his core. He threw himself into the Imagineering facilities in Glendale, California and – surprisingly frankly – asked Imagineers to show and explain what they were working on. It was on that day, apparently, that Eisner began to green light projects left and right, trusting that Imagineers knew their parks and could craft exceptional attractions given the freedom to dream big. Eisner was certain that his team could build Disneyland into a place even teenagers would want to visit. To make it happen, he’d use his strength once again: movies.

Ride the movies

It was Eisner’s controversial idea that Disney Parks could be a place where guests would “ride the movies.” While that was a brave enough idea, he also argued that they didn’t necessarily have to be Disney movies! After all, remember that Disney wasn’t making many movies worth celebrating in the early 1980s. But someone was.

Image: Disney / Lucasfilm

Eisner reached out to George Lucas, the creator of Star Wars, about bringing the world of the film series (owned and distributed by 20th Century Fox) into Disney Parks. The partnership was a success, resulting in Captain EO (1986) and, less than a year later, the real test of Eisner's cinematic formula: a ride that changed Disney Parks forever. We chronicled the full and complete story of that stellar collaboration in a standalone feature – Lost Legend: Star Tours.

Star Tours' success paved the way for more, and Eisner’s movie-making mantra came to life again shortly thereafter when plans for a filmmaking-themed pavilion at EPCOT Center took on a life of their own and became a full-fledged, standalone movie-making park: Disney-MGM Studios. Shortly after opening, the park became home to its own Star Tours and, nearby, the Indiana Jones Epic Stunt Spectacular based on Lucas’ other runaway smash property.

“The Tomorrowland Problem”

As the 1990s approached, Imagineers faced a unique and growing challenge: one we’ve often referred to here as the Tomorrowland Problem. Both Disneyland and Magic Kingdom contain Tomorrowlands – themed areas that, according to Walt’s dedication speech, are meant to “signify man’s achievements… A step into the future, with predictions of constructed things to come.”

Sounds easy. However, the “tomorrow” that Imagineers had designed in 1955 was set in the unimaginably distant year of… 1986. It didn’t last enough to become outdated, though. In 1967 – just 12 years after the park opened – Tomorrowland leapt forward. The New Tomorrowland Walt and his Imagineers designed was iconic – a white, geometric, simple land of pastel colors with the glorious Peoplemover zipping overhead, submarines churning through crystal lakes, the rotating Carousel Theater, and an expansion pad cordoned off to become the gleaming Space Mountain.

Image: Disney

The “old” Tomorrowland had contained a starring attraction called Flight to the Moon. The predecessor to a modern motion simulator, Flight to the Moon was really just a series of seats arranged in concentric circles around a central platform (above). Seated guests would watch through projected “portholes” and “glass windows” at the center, simulating a trip through space and a moon landing. Evidence of “the Tomorrowland Problem,” Flight to the Moon wasn’t feeling very futuristic by the 1960s, as regular trips to the moon made the ride seem like the stuff of today’s headlines, not tomorrow’s. Fittingly, the simple attraction received a simple upgrade and re-debuted in this New Tomorrowland as the much more futuristic Mission to Mars.

When Magic Kingdom opened in 1971 with its own Tomorrowland, it had the benefit of learning from Disneyland’s mistakes and its Tomorrowland was already future-ready with its own Peoplemover, Circlevision, Carousel Theater, and a purpose-built Mission to Mars.

Trouble is, tomorrow always becomes today, and by the 1990s, both Tomorrowlands were feeling downright dated. Luckily, Imagineers had a new blank canvas on which to put a new idea to the test.

Image: Disney

Imagineers designing Disneyland Paris set out to fix the Tomorrowland Problem permanently by leaving Tomorrowland out of the French park entirely. In its place stands Discoveryland, a retro­-­futuristic land. Discoveryland doesn’t even try to imagine what the future might really look like. Instead, it’s a vision of the future as imagined from great thinkers of the past! Rather than sleek white landscapes showcasing evolving technologies, Discoveryland is a golden seaport that looks right out of the pages of Jules Verne, Leonardo da Vinci, or H.G. Wells.

Spurred by the innovation, Eisner okayed a major change at Disney Parks in the U.S. He wanted Imagineers to craft New New Tomorrowlands. But unlike the New Tomorrowlands of old, these overlays would fix the Tomorrowland Problem permanently by taking the science out of the land. Instead of really trying to predict what the future might look like (an impossible, expensive, and maintenance-heavy task), these New Tomorrowland’s would follow Paris’ example.

This is where things get interesting…. Not to mention, terrifying.

FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Comments

As someone who has ridden Alien Encounter, Stitch's Great Escape and Superstar Limo I can tell you that without question Superstar Limo was by far the worst ride. No way was Stitch as bad as that monstrosity.

I never liked Stitch all that much--or Lilo, either. I found both characters highly annoying, and almost walked out of the theater a couple of times. I was irritated by Stitch's overwhelming popularity & dominance of the Disney Parks. My fave Disney character is Iago, and I made a tee shirt with a patch of Iago, and wrote underneath it, "Stitch drools, Iago rules!" Totally upset this one sensitive Stitch fan who worked at the candy store at Disney's Hollywood Studios, & haven't worn the shirt since. (I think she actually broke down in tears.) (And no, I did not like "Under New Management" even with Iago; the original Tiki Room is a childhood favorite.) I saw Stitch's Great Escape twice and thought it was okay (which is generous given other people's opinions), though I was quite distracted the first time as I was thinking about this cast member who was rude to me not once, but twice, before the show. Still, I'm glad it's gone now, and I'm glad ever since Elsa & Anna appeared on the scene, that Stitch's popularity is fading. I never did like crude humor, anyway.

I went on this ride in 2009 when I was 16. I was at the age where I can appreciate the work that went into animatronics, themes, and tech that went into each attraction. We did Stitch once. Just once. We did under new management once. Iago was ugly as all hell, Zazu looked much better but I was a huge fan of the Tiki Room in Disneyland and hated the corporate feel to Under New Management. Now Stitch was a weird one. I loved the theme, thought it was downright adorable. Hated the animation used for the ride, felt like the robot was out of place horribly since we see no robots in the Lilo and Stitch franchise at all. Thought the story of the ride was actually horrible. How'd Gantu forget about stitch? This clearly doesn't take place before the movie starts because he calls himself Stitch at the end of the ride right before he's transported to earth. Gantu wouldn't underestimate Stitch in the movie when he's in lockdown at the start after seeing what he did in the holding cell. It fit so horribly. That's my biggest problem with it. At least Star Tours just took place in the same universe and didn't say "Oh yeah and Quigon is driving the ship even though he's dead."

After all of that I wanted to ride it again. Why? Because the tech used in the ride was interesting to look at. I wasn't uncomfortable sitting in the ride, the pressing down of the harness doesn't hurt as much as someone his size actually standing on your shoulders like I've actually done with my young siblings. The jokes were childish but I was like "Oh this is for little kids." But you do make a very good point. The darkness isn't for little kids and my brother at the time still slept with a nightlight on. He didn't like it much and same with the rest of my family. I just wanted to see the Stitch animatronic again. Tokyo Disney did much better with putting Stitch in a pre-existing ride. I really liked what they did with it, there was actual passion that went into redoing Tiki Room with Stitch ruining the ride on purpose, it embraces what people actually liked about Lilo and Stitch and it was the modern Hawaiian culture mixed with a little bit of tradition, then a little bit of Stitch messing around and ruining everything. So I'm not against stitch in any way, I just find what we got versus what other places got is unfair. I was actually upset that other places got amazing technology put into their rides, mystic manor, shanghai pirates, etc, and what we got for our first trackless ride and remaking of pirates was a Ho-down and removing the wenches being sold off and removing my favorite parts of the ride, removing the oldman echoing through the caverns and putting in davy jones and now we don't hear the captain auctioning off the women. I loved those voices. We aren't doing well as far as our rides go in the states, we need the help of the imagineers who worked in the overseas parks.

Regarding the rumored replacement: Unfortunately the "sequel coming" is jettisoning the "retro game" thing in favor of the Internet and even calling it "Ralph Breaks the Internet" (read: naming it in reference to a stupid meme we all should have just long forgotten by now). Which answers the comment on how "Wreck-It Ralph" would fit into Tomorrowland, though the Internet being this cool new thing and a "world" unto itself is late-90s-mid-2000s dated territory if you ask me.

I agree with everything you have to say about the ride itself, but I do object to the implication that Lilo & Stitch has aged poorly. It's true that Disney has run the franchise into the ground with countless ill-advised sequels and a dubious TV spin-off, but the original film, taken by itself, still holds up as one of Disney's strongest features from the early 2000s.

View More Comments

Add new comment

About Theme Park Tourist

Theme Park Tourist is one of the web’s leading sources of essential information and entertaining articles about theme parks in Orlando and beyond.

We are one of the world’s largest theme park guide sites, hosting detailed guides to more than 80 theme parks around the globe.

Find Out More About Us...

Plan Your Trip

Our theme park guides contain reviews and ratings of rides, restaurants and hotels at more than 80 theme parks worldwide.

You can even print them.

Start Planning Now...